Mitigating Risks in the Composting of High-Impact Organic Residuals

Introduction

Composting is a biological process that transforms organic waste materials into a stable, nutrient-rich soil amendment known as compost. Traditionally, industrial-scale composting facilities have specialised in processing garden organics, which includes primarily carbon-rich yard waste like leaves, branches, and grass clippings. These materials, often referred to as "browns," provide the necessary bulking agents that facilitate aeration and the fibrous structure that supports microbial activity essential for the composting process (Brink Nils, 1993).

The expertise and protocols of the workforces managing these facilities are well-established around the predictable and more straightforward characteristics of garden organic waste streams. Such waste is typically dry, structurally diverse, and lower in nitrogen content, resulting in a slow, manageable composting process with minimal nuisance and environmental impacts. In contrast, higher-risk, putrescible organic waste encompass a variety of residential and commercial food waste, animal mortalities and abattoir waste, and farm effluent. These materials are more moisture-rich, denser, and decompose at a faster rate due to their elevated nitrogen content, presenting different challenges in the composting process (Liang Zhong-hu).

With the rise of sustainability mandates that encourage the diversion of food and other organic waste from across the supply chain from ending up in landfills, come programs such as Food Organics and Garden Organics (FOGO).  Industrial composting facilities must now adapt to handle these higher-risk materials. Composting this category of waste can be inherently more complex and risky due to increased odour, higher potential for pathogen spread, difficulty in balancing the composting mass's carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio, and greater risk of generating greenhouse gases like methane (CH4) and ammonia (NH3) (N. Lovanh et al., 2014).

This transition presents numerous challenges that extend beyond the composting process itself, potentially impacting workforce safety, facility design, and environmental compliance. This article aims to compare and contrast the complexities and risks associated with composting high-nitrogen, high-fat, putrescible organic waste streams versus traditional garden organics and explore how industrial composting operations must evolve to manage these changes effectively.

Comparing the Waste Streams

Garden organics, consisting of yard waste such as leaves, wood chips, plant trimmings, and grass clippings, are characteristic of standard materials processed by industrial composting facilities. These materials are primarily carbonaceous and provide the necessary structure and aeration that are critical for the composting process. The carbon in these materials serves as an energy source for the microorganisms that break down organic matter. Garden organics typically have a lower moisture content and a higher carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C/N ratio), which facilitates a slower and more controlled decomposition process. This relatively high C/N ratio, ideally between 25:1 and 30:1, helps to minimise the release of nitrogen as ammonia, reducing potential odours and contributing to a quality compost product (Jiangming Zhou, 2017).

In contrast, high-nitrogen, high-fat, putrescible organic wastes, such as food scraps, meat, and dairy products, have fundamentally different properties. These materials are categorised by high moisture content, density, and a significantly lower C/N ratio, often well below 20:1. As a result, they decompose much faster, leading to a more intense and rapid biological activity. The high protein and fat content can lead to excessive nitrogen in the form of ammonia, which if not managed properly, can result in strong odours and increase the potential for nutrient imbalances within the composting matrix. Moreover, these wastes can attract pests and require careful handling to prevent the development of pathogens or the production of phytotoxic compounds during the composting process (D. Oudart et al., 2015).

The primary challenge when composting high-nitrogen, high-fat waste is managing the rapid biological decomposition that these materials undergo. Without adequate carbon sources to balance the high nitrogen content, the composting mass can quickly become anaerobic, creating conditions that favour the production of malodorous compounds and methane, a potent greenhouse gas. To combat these challenges, industrial composters must closely manage moisture levels, aeration, and the addition of bulking agents to ensure a balanced and efficient composting process (S. Sommer, 2001).

As more communities adopt FOGO programs to divert food waste from landfills, the need to understand and manage these differences becomes imperative for industrial composting operations desiring to create quality compost while minimising environmental impact.

Risks Unique to High-Nitrogen, High-Fat Waste

The composting of high-nitrogen, high-fat, putrescible waste presents several risks and challenges distinct from those associated with garden organics. A key concern with composting these materials is the management of biological risks, particularly the spread of pathogens. Food wastes, especially those of animal origin, can contain harmful microorganisms that, if not properly treated through sustained thermophilic composting, can pose health risks to humans and animals. This risk necessitates maintaining high temperatures (above 55°C) for extended periods to ensure pathogen kill-off, a requirement that adds complexity to composting operations (P. Robin et al., 2015)1.

Another significant environmental risk is the potential for nutrient pollution. High-nitrogen, high-fat substances can be rich in ammonia and other soluble nutrients that, if not controlled, may lead to leachate production and nutrient runoff. These effluents can contaminate local water bodies, leading to eutrophication and affecting aquatic ecosystems (M. Hassouna et al., 2007). Additionally, improperly managed compost piles with excessive nitrogen can lead to the volatilization of ammonia and the production of nitrous oxide, both of which contribute to air pollution and are potent greenhouse gases (N. Lovanh et al., 2014).

Operationally, the rapid decomposition of high-nitrogen and high-fat wastes generates a substantial amount of heat, which can become difficult to manage. Without proper aeration and turning, compost piles may develop anaerobic "hot spots" that hinder microbial activity and the composting process's efficiency. Furthermore, the high fat content can create a physical barrier around waste materials, inhibiting microorganisms' access and leading to incomplete decomposition (J. Paillat et al., 2005).

From a regulatory standpoint, composting high-nitrogen, high-fat organic waste requires adherence to stricter guidelines and controls, given the increased risks. Composting facilities must implement robust monitoring systems to measure and mitigate odours, pathogens, and emissions, thus ensuring compliance with environmental standards and public health safety. This necessity often results in additional investment in infrastructure and technology, and heightened scrutiny from regulatory bodies (S. Sommer, 2001).

These considerations underscore why composting high-nitrogen, high-fat waste is inherently riskier and more complex than dealing with garden organics. Subsequent sections will discuss adapting workforce expertise and the mitigation measures available to manage these risks effectively.

Adapting Workforce Expertise and Protocols

The shift in input materials from primarily garden organics to including high-nitrogen, high-fat waste streams has necessitated a parallel shift in workforce expertise and protocol adaptation at industrial composting facilities. Personnel traditionally trained in the management of yard waste must now become proficient in handling the unique challenges posed by putrescible organic waste.

Workforce Training

The rapid decomposition rates, odour control issues, and pathogen management requirements associated with high-nitrogen, high-fat waste composting demand specialised knowledge and training. Workers need up-to-date training on best practices for monitoring and adjusting composting parameters such as temperature, oxygen levels, and moisture content to maintain the desired composting conditions. Regulatory compliance also becomes more critical, and the workforce must be familiar with the specialised record-keeping and reporting that these waste streams require (S. Sommer et al., 2004).

Health and Safety Protocols

Enhanced safety protocols are necessary due to the increased risk of exposure to pathogens and toxic gases. The implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), hygienic practices, and emergency procedures must be prioritised to protect workers from potential health hazards (J. Paillat et al., 2005).

Protocol Adaptation

The addition of food waste into the composting stream requires revising standard operating procedures, including pre-processing methods such as grinding or de-packaging, continuous monitoring for signs of anaerobic conditions, and more frequent turning or aeration to ensure a homogenous and stable composting process (M. Hessouna et al., 2007).

Engineering Controls

Facilities may need to upgrade infrastructure, such as introducing biofilters, covered composting systems, or anaerobic digestion technologies, to accommodate the greater complexity of composting high-nitrogen, high-fat materials. Such advances can help mitigate risks by providing better control over the composting environment and reducing emissions (N. Lovanh et al., 2014).

To effectively process the more complex waste streams, composting operations must invest in their workforce's re-education, ensuring that employees are equipped with the knowledge and tools necessary to tackle the enhanced demands of composting high-nitrogen, high-fat waste.

Mitigation Measures for High-Risk Waste

Facilities that compost high-nitrogen, high-fat, putrescible waste must employ a range of mitigation measures to address the increased risks associated with this more complex composting process.

Balancing the Composting Mix

To offset the low C/N ratio of high-nitrogen waste, facilities can add carbon-rich bulking agents like sawdust, wood chips, or straw to the composting mix. This addition helps absorb excess moisture, improves aeration, and supports microbial diversity by providing a more balanced environment conducive to effective composting (S. Sommer et al., 2004).

Turns and Aeration

Frequent turning or forced aeration can prevent the development of anaerobic conditions, ensuring that oxygen levels remain sufficient to support aerobic decomposition and minimise odour issues. A well-aerated pile also reduces the risk of spontaneous combustion, which can occur in heaps with excessive heat buildup (D. Oudart et al., 2015).

Temperature Monitoring

Maintaining the compost at thermophilic temperatures (between 55°C and 65°C) for an extended period is crucial for pathogen kill-off and sanitisation of the final product. This heat can also expedite the breakdown of fats and proteins, further reducing the risk of putrefaction and odour (P. Robin et al., 2015).

Containment and Biofiltration

Covered composting systems, biofilters, or enclosed composting vessels can aid in controlling odours, preventing nutrient runoff, and confining the composting process to manage better the environmental conditions that influence decomposition (N. Lovanh et al., 2014).

Additives

Incorporating substances such as biochar or zeolites can help to capture excess ammonia, thus reducing odours and the release of nitrogen into the environment. Similarly, certain microbial inoculants or enzymes can be added to accelerate the decomposition process and enhance compost quality (J. Paillat et al., 2005).

pH Adjustment

Assessing and adjusting the pH of the composting mix can further mitigate nitrogen loss. An acidic environment can aid in the conversion of ammonia to ammonium, which is less volatile and remains in the compost, improving its nutrient profile (M. Hassouna et al., 2007).

By implementing these measures, composting facilities can better manage the complexities and minimise the risks associated with processing high-nitrogen, high-fat organic waste, resulting in a greener, safer, and more effective composting practice.

Economic and Efficiency Considerations

The adaptation of industrial composting facilities to include high-nitrogen, high-fat waste streams involves both economic investments and operational efficiency challenges. These factors must be carefully considered to ensure the viability and sustainability of composting as a waste management solution.

Economic Impacts

Investing in new or upgraded facilities and equipment, such as biofilters, enclosed composting vessels, or anaerobic digesters, represents a significant upfront cost. However, these costs can be offset by the long-term savings from diverting waste from landfills, which is both economically and environmentally costly. Furthermore, the finished compost produced by processing a diverse range of inputs, including high-nitrogen materials, can be of higher quality and thus command a premium in the marketplace (Zhang et al., 2020).

Operational Efficiency

The need to balance the composition of the input materials requires careful planning and monitoring, which can lead to increased labour and management costs. This necessity for intensive management may reduce the throughput efficiency of the composting process. However, through optimization and automation of processes, such as continuous monitoring systems for temperature and moisture, facilities can mitigate these efficiency losses (S. Sommer, 2003).

Infrastructure and Technology

The transition to composting high-nitrogen, high-fat waste requires a re-evaluation of existing infrastructure. For instance, managing the increased risk of odours and emissions may necessitate the construction of controlled composting environments with specialised air handling systems. Such technology not only reduces environmental and health risks but also ensures regulatory compliance (N. Lovanh et al., 2008).

Market Opportunities

An efficient composting operation can capitalise on the growing market demand for sustainable and organic waste management solutions. By meeting this demand, composting facilities can enhance their market position and potentially gain access to beneficial partnerships, government incentives, or grants aimed at promoting sustainable practices (Paillat et al., 2005).

By recognizing and addressing the economic and efficiency considerations associated with composting high-nitrogen, high-fat organic waste, facilities can achieve a sustainable model for waste management that balances costs with environmental and societal benefits.

Conclusion

The introduction of high-nitrogen, high-fat, putrescible organic waste into industrial composting processes presents substantial challenges but also significant opportunities for waste management practices. Through the discussions in this article, we have highlighted the key differences between composting these complex waste streams and traditional garden organics. We have identified the elevated risks associated with the former, including increased biological risks due to pathogens, heightened environmental impacts from emissions and runoff, and more demanding operational requirements.

Facilities faced with these challenges must prioritise workforce training to ensure that all personnel are equipped with the necessary knowledge to navigate these complexities safely. By revising procedures, investing in appropriate infrastructure, and adopting innovative technologies and methodologies, composting operations can mitigate the risks and maximise the potential benefits of processing high-risk waste streams.

Moreover, addressing the economic and efficiency considerations is vital for long-term sustainability. While the initial costs of transitioning may be significant, the long-term benefits of diverting waste from landfills, producing high-quality compost, and meeting the increasing demand for green waste solutions can justify these investments.

In conclusion, adapting industrial composting practices to include high-nitrogen, high-fat waste is an important step toward a more sustainable, circular economy. It requires careful management, but with the right approaches, it can significantly contribute to environmental conservation, economic benefits, and the advancement of composting technology.

This comparative analysis aims to inform and empower composting facilities, regulators, and other stakeholders to make informed decisions that enhance the management of organic waste, paving the way for more resilient and effective waste management systems.

References

Brink, Nils. “Composting of Food Waste and Waste Paper with Top Soils for Nitrogen Catching.” (1993). https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064719309411247

Jiangming Zhou. "The Effect of Different C/N Ratios on the Composting of Pig Manure and Edible Fungus Residue with Rice Bran." (2017). https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2016.1233081

D. Oudart, P. Robin, J. Paillat, and E. Paul. "Modelling nitrogen and carbon interactions in composting of animal manure in naturally aerated piles." (2015). https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.07.044

S. Sommer. "Effect of composting on nutrient loss and nitrogen availability of cattle deep litter." (2001). https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00087-3

Paillat, J., Robin, P., Hassouna, M., & Leterme, P. "Predicting ammonia and carbon dioxide emissions from carbon and nitrogen biodegradability during animal waste composting." (2005). https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2005.07.045

Sommer, S., et al. "Composting of animal manure and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review." (2004). https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2004.03.007

Hassouna, M., Robin, P., Leterme, P., & Paillat, J. "Influence of aerobic treatment duration and VS/N ratio on composting kinetic and nitrogen dynamic." (2007). https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-007-0181-2

Lovanh, N., Loughrin, J. H., Cook, K., Silva, P., & Oh, B. "Effect of Windrow Management on Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Swine Manure Composting." (2014).

Sommer, S., & Møller, H. B. "Separate vs. communal manure handling systems on livestock farms." (2003). https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(02)00133-0

Zhang, Z., Liu, D., Qiao, Y., Li, S., Chen, Y., & Hu, C. "Mitigation of carbon and nitrogen losses during pig manure composting: A meta-analysis." (2020). https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.10.035